I think our Minister of Economic Affairs, Jyri Häkämies, is doing well to promote the role of growth companies in cleantech. Small innovative companies with growth ambitions are the best source of new jobs and continued prosperity. The government can support this growth by creating good conditions for new innovations to succeed. The abundance of capable engineers with experience of working for one of the leading global companies is a definite asset for building these new innovations, also in Green ICT. However, should they target Green ICT or something else is also a question on which areas we, as Finland, want succeed longer-term.
June 15, 2012 by Iivo Vehvilainen
简体中文Русский
4
0
You need to internationalise the Finnish cleantech industry - nobody outside of Finland knows what is going on there!
(There is a German expression "Tu was Gutes und sprich darüber")
The best way to do this is to attract FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) from Germany. Last year we advised Invest in Finland - www.investinfinland.fi - how we thought that this should be done.
June 21, 2012 by Ds
简体中文Русский
1
0
Sorry - no answers, just more questions. I can't help but to think that Nokia would still be more than successful if they were in any other business. I can't think of any other sector where there's so much hype and constant technological leaps than smartphones. A year in smartphones seems to be like five years in other industries.
If we could focus what we've learned from making smartphones to cleantech, we might get some really good results in surprisingly short time. I like to compare modern phones to hang gliding instruments. A top of the line instrument costs about 1000€, but is technically far inferior to just about any phone around. The market however is less than 1/10000th of the cell phone market and there's very little competition, so the situation is stable. If Nokia made them they would cost 50€.
So for gliding instruments the market isn't there, but are there any cleantech alternatives that have a greater potential market? What kind of devices are currently ineffective, big and clunky or just too expensive to really make a difference? How can we fix that?
If we could focus what we've learned from making smartphones to cleantech, we might get some really good results in surprisingly short time. I like to compare modern phones to hang gliding instruments. A top of the line instrument costs about 1000€, but is technically far inferior to just about any phone around. The market however is less than 1/10000th of the cell phone market and there's very little competition, so the situation is stable. If Nokia made them they would cost 50€.
So for gliding instruments the market isn't there, but are there any cleantech alternatives that have a greater potential market? What kind of devices are currently ineffective, big and clunky or just too expensive to really make a difference? How can we fix that?
Add new comment